RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review and appraise the evidence regarding airway ultrasound assessment in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in adult patients. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the Cochrane collaboration guidelines and the recommendations for the systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies. Observational studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of airway ultrasound for the prediction of difficult laryngoscopy were included for consideration. SETTING: Literature searches were performed in 4 databases (PubMed [Medline], Embase, Clinical Trials, and Google Scholar) to identify all observational studies using any ultrasound technique to assess difficult laryngoscopy. The search terms included "sonography," "ultrasound," "airway," "difficult airway," "difficult laryngoscopy," "Cormack," "risk factors," "ultrasound at the point of care," "difficult ventilation," "difficult intubation" and others, combined with sensitive filters. The search was done for studies performed in the last 20 years in English or Spanish. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients older than 18 years old under general anesthesia for an elective procedure. Evident anatomic airway abnormalities, obstetric populations, those using an alternative imaging method besides ultrasound, and animal studies were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative bedside ultrasound measuring distances and ratios from the skin to different reference points, such as the ratio of the hyomental distance in a neutral position (HMDN) and hyomental distance in extension (HMDR), HMDN, and the skin-to-epiglottis distance (SED), the preepiglottic area, and tongue thickness, among others. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 24 studies evaluated the prediction of a difficult laryngoscopy using airway ultrasound. The diagnostic performance and the number of ultrasound parameters reported in the studies were variable. Meta-analysis was performed for 3 measurements consistently included in most studies. The SED and the HMDR ratio presented a sensitivity of 75% and 61%, respectively, and a specificity of 86% and 88%, respectively. The ratio of the preepiglottic distance to the epiglottic distance at the midpoint of the vocal cords (pre-E/E-VC) presented the best performance for predicting a difficult laryngoscopy (sensitivity: 82%, specificity: 83%, diagnostic odds ratio: 22.2). CONCLUSION: With the currently available evidence, the 3 commonly used point-of-care ultrasound measures used to identify difficult laryngoscopy, (SED, HMDR, and pre-E/E-VC), showed better sensitivity and similar specificity to clinical measures. Future studies and more data may change the authors' confidence in these conclusions, given the wide variability of measurements noted in studies.
Assuntos
Intubação Intratraqueal , Laringoscopia , Laringoscopia/métodos , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Ultrassonografia/métodosRESUMO
Abstract Introduction: The safety climate (SC) measurement in the hospitals, is essential for the development of a patient safety policy (PSP). Information about SC in the operating rooms is scarce. Objective: To measure the dimensions of SC in Colombian Operating Rooms according to characteristics of surgical staff. Methods: Cross-sectional study. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety and an additional module for operating rooms were administered to healthcare workers in 6 high-complexity hospitals in the Metropolitan Area of Medellín (Colombia). The positive responses percentage for each dimension was measured. Differences by profession and type of contract were analyzed. Results: A total of442 participants were included. The workers in the operating rooms perceive a weak SC in terms of non-punitive response to error and workload (49.4% and 59.3% positive responses, respectively). Differences were found between physicians and nurses with lower scores in nursing for dimensions related to patient care. Anesthesiologists present low scores in events reporting. There are also differences by the type of work contract. Conclusion: Despite the PSP, the perception of a punitive culture to error, with a high workload. Recognizing differences between the groups within the surgical units helps to focus interventions strengthening the patient safety.
Resumen Introducción: La medición del clima de seguridad (CS) en las instituciones de salud es parte fundamental del desarrollo de una política de seguridad del paciente (PSP). Existe poca información acerca de la medición de clima de seguridad en las unidades quirúrgicas. Objetivo: Medir las dimensiones del CS en las unidades quirúrgicas de seis instituciones de salud colombianas según las características del personal. Métodos: Estudio de corte transversal. El cuestionario sobre seguridad del paciente en los hospitales (HSOPS) más la adición de un módulo para unidades quirúrgicas se aplicó al personal de seis hospitales de III nivel de Medellín (Colombia). Se midió el porcentaje de respuestas positivas para cada dimensión del CS. Se analizaron las diferencias por profesión y tipo de contratación. Resultados: Se incluyeron 442 participantes. El personal de las unidades quirúrgicas percibe un CS débil en respuesta no punitiva al error y carga de trabajo (49,4 % y 59,3 % de respuestas positivas respectivamente). Se encontraron diferencias entre personal médico y de enfermería con puntajes más bajos de percepción de CS en enfermería para aquellas dimensiones relacionadas con cuidado del paciente. Los anestesiólogos presentan puntajes bajos en el reporte de eventos. Existen además diferencias según el tipo de contrato de trabajo. Conclusiones: A pesar de la implementación de políticas de seguridad del paciente, persiste la percepción de una cultura punitiva frente al error, con una carga de trabajo elevado. El reconocimiento de las diferencias entre los grupos en las unidades quirúrgicas permitirá focalizar intervenciones que fortalezcan la seguridad del paciente.
